If we are to expect an individual to participate effectively in a
democratic society, it is essential that the individual develop a good
measure of self respect, which, of course, transfers to "character", and
responsibility. To have self respect one must like oneself. And it seems
only reasonable that that sense of liking oneself is best developed from
being liked and treated kindly by those around. Thus, a person who likes
himself or herself, is a happy person, and a person of character who is
willing to bend over backwards to honor any kind of commitment to others.
This process of being liked, and liking begins at an early age. If
parents, guardians and teachers are too self-absorbed in their own
interests, to provide the atmosphere favorable to this development, we must
consider why this is so. And if this be the case, the finger of guilt must
point to that prime suspect - the overemphasis we place on competition, and
individualism, those close relatives to capitalism and free-enterprise.
The evidence indicating that Americans are failing the self-esteem
test, and consequently the democratic system, is almost overwhelming. Most
seem to blame the politicians rather than those who elect them. More and
more Americans find less time to go to the polls. Fewer than 50% of the
eligible voters participate in most elections throughout the nation. Most
who do vote are poorly informed on the candidates and the issues. Less
than half can give even the names of their congressman or the two senators
who represent them in Washington. Money and sound bites have become the
key to electoral campaigns. Seldom is an issue examined in depth.
The development of character, the nurturing of positive self-image
based on trust and responsibility are apparently taking a back seat to
aggressive competition in the marketplace. Rather than looking inward, and
fostering personal, and human values to produce happiness, we find
ourselves searching outwardly for the acquisition of materialistic things
to obtain happiness. While many may recognize the futility of this effort,
any attempt to change seems blocked as though under the grip of some
powerful drug. Of course this is not to mean that one should never seek
material comforts. It's the degree to which one does so that matters.
As brought forth in the proceeding dialogue, human avarice is the
overriding threat to the survival of the human race; perhaps all life
species as well. The measure of human avarice or greed is not simply a
function of genetics, or "human nature", but it can be greatly influenced
by environmental factors. The educational systems, societal rules, laws,
institutions, the prevailing conventional wisdom all affect the level of
greed existing, or conversely, ability of humans to understand the need
for, and the means to achieve cooperation necessary to overcome today's and
tomorrow's threats to our collective survival.
Therefore it appears to be clear that it's time we stop blaming "human
nature" for our dilemma, and as individuals undertake the responsibility to
modify our pursuit of materialism and join the fight to maintain our
collective survival! We must work together to reshape the network of human
institutions that do shape our "human nature" For by now it should be
painstakingly clear that our present "human nature" is not equipped to do
battle with the powerful environmental threats posed by the encroaching
Twenty-first century.
To accomplish this task, the restructuring of "human nature", America
needs leaders dedicated not simply to holding power and office, but
primarily to influencing people, and effecting actual change. We have been
taught that power, position, wealth, and winning is all that matters. We
live in a system that molds, as well as imprisons, our minds. We are
prisoners and victims of that system much the same as were the colonists
under the rule of King George of England, when with the leadership of a few
truly dedicated men, a successful rebellion, and revolution producing
independence was accomplished.
Today a new declaration of independence is called for! It might begin:
When in the course of human events a system in control of our lives is so
pervasive as to result in conditions so burdensome and so intolerable we
have little choice but to rise up and overthrow it. We find these truths
to be self-evident:
Whereas; over-reliance on free enterprise has provided most Americans
with an abundance of material comforts, we are yet left too ignorant,
apathetic, selfish, and ill-equipped to function effectively in a
democratic structure.
Whereas; that system has resulted in a grossly inequitable distribution
of wealth.
Whereas; having been reared in our present system, many Americans have
developed attitudes devoid of understanding or compassion for the "have
nots" as well as simplistic, narrow-minded concepts concerning race,
minorities, religion, and poverty.
Whereas; over one million Americans are presently incarcerated, and
crime remains the number one concern in almost all political campaigns.
Whereas; most Americans have fallen victim to the propaganda put out
that government and taxes are their mortal enemies.
Whereas; the "moneyed interests" have succeeded in convincing most
that quality health care for all is too costly.
Whereas; most Americans remain too intellectually anesthetized to
fully comprehend the burgeoning threats to our collective survival in
the coming 21st Century.
Be it now resolved; that to counter these intolerable, and deplorable
conditions we shall begin with the 95% of the wealth possessed by only 5%
of the people. We shall cut through all the hysteria, admonitions,
excuses, and evasions, and tax that wealth to provide:
1) Decent universal health care for all citizens.
2) An allocation of at least 20%, not the present 7% of our resources (GNP)
to the field of education, which comprises the backbone of our hopes for
economic growth, as well as human understanding.
3) Investment (welfare, as some would call it ) to give every child an
equal and fair start; to provide every senior citizen security, and to
truly reconstruct the infrastructure of our cities.
Should this be accomplished, then, and perhaps only then, may we in
America experience political campaigns free of negativism, racism, and fear
tactics, proposing vengeful, short-sighted solutions to crime. We might
then have campaigns which focus upon actual issues and real solutions
rather than simply the denigration of politicians, taxes, and government.
But even well beyond that; this revolution, this massive investment in
human resources, which President Clinton once proposed, but so far failed
to deliver, will eventually free us of much of the alienation, and the
anxieties, presently felt by many, which tend to short-circuit our
attention away from dealing with our collective responsibility to counter
the monumental threats facing human survival on this planet!
Back to the table of contents
|